If I had a dollar for every time someone told me “just be consistent and use positive reinforcement,” as if that’s all it takes to solve every dog behavior issue, I could probably afford a lifetime supply of high-value treats. The problem isn’t that consistency and positive reinforcement are wrong—they’re foundational. The problem is the assumption that a universal method applied the same way will work equally well for every dog.
The science of dog cognition tells us something very different: dogs are individuals shaped by complex, interacting factors that make generic training approaches ineffective at best and harmful at worst.
The Science Behind Individual Differences
Research in dog cognition, particularly the work of Brian Hare and his colleagues, has fundamentally changed our understanding of how dogs learn and behave. We now know that dogs are incredibly sophisticated social learners who don’t simply respond to commands like biological robots. They’re constantly reading our emotional states, anticipating behavior patterns, and adapting to the complex social structures we create around them.
What researchers call “social referencing”—the way dogs look to humans for information about how to respond to situations—means that dogs are processing far more than just whether they’ll get a treat for sitting. They’re reading tension in your voice, inconsistencies between family members, and the emotional climate of your household. A Border Collie in a chaotic, unpredictable home will show completely different behaviors than the same genetic dog in a calm, structured environment.
This is why the one-size-fits-all approach falls apart: it ignores the reality that dog behavior emerges from the interaction of multiple complex systems, not just training technique.
The L.E.G.S.® Framework: Understanding the Whole Dog
The L.E.G.S.® framework—which examines Learning, Environment, Genetics, and Self—provides a science-based structure for understanding why generic training methods fail to address the root causes of behavior.
Learning: Context Is Everything
Dogs don’t learn in a vacuum. A dog who can “sit” perfectly at home might completely fall apart at the dog park. Their learning is context-dependent, affected by stress levels, excitement, environmental factors, and their emotional state.
Generic training programs assume that if you teach a behavior in one context, the dog should be able to perform it everywhere. But research shows this isn’t how learning works for dogs (or humans, for that matter). Learning is state-dependent and context-specific.
A reactive dog who’s in a heightened state of arousal isn’t “refusing” to respond to previously learned commands—their nervous system is in survival mode, and the cognitive centers required for learned behaviors are temporarily offline. Telling their owner to “just be more consistent” ignores the neurological reality of what’s happening in that dog’s brain.
Environment: More Than Just Physical Space
When we talk about environment in the L.E.G.S.® framework, we’re not just talking about whether you have a yard or live in an apartment. We’re talking about the emotional climate of the household, the predictability of routines, the level of chaos or calm, and the consistency (or inconsistency) of human behavior.
I’ve seen “difficult” dogs transform almost overnight when moved to a more structured, emotionally stable environment—with zero change in training methods. Because the issue wasn’t training technique; it was that the dog was living in a state of chronic stress from an unpredictable, emotionally charged household.
Generic training programs can’t account for this. They assume all dogs are living in reasonably stable environments with consistent caregivers. For many dogs, that assumption is false.
Genetics: Bred for Different Jobs, Wired for Different Behaviors
Here’s where the science gets really clear about why one-size-fits-all fails: dogs were selectively bred for thousands of years to perform specific jobs, and those genetic predispositions don’t disappear just because we’re not using them for their original purposes anymore.
A Border Collie’s herding instincts, a terrier’s prey drive, a guardian breed’s suspicion of strangers, a retriever’s desire to carry objects—these aren’t “behavior problems” that need correcting. They’re genetically ingrained traits that were deliberately selected for over hundreds of generations.
Training a guardian breed to be immediately friendly with strangers goes against their genetic wiring. You can manage it, you can teach impulse control, but you’re fighting biology. Similarly, trying to train a high-drive herding breed to be calm and sedate in a small apartment with minimal mental stimulation isn’t a training challenge—it’s an impossible ask.
Generic training programs often treat all “problem behaviors” the same way, as if reactivity in a German Shepherd happens for the same reasons and requires the same approach as reactivity in a Cocker Spaniel. The science tells us this is nonsense. Genetics matter enormously, and effective behavior modification must account for breed-specific traits and individual temperament.
Self: Every Dog Is an Individual
Even within breeds, every dog is unique. Litter mates raised in identical environments can have vastly different temperaments, stress responses, and learning styles. Some dogs are more resilient, some more sensitive. Some are food-motivated, some aren’t. Some have higher arousal thresholds, some are constantly vigilant.
This individual variation means that what works beautifully for one dog might completely fail for another—even dogs of the same breed, same age, and same household.
I’ve worked with families who have two dogs from the same litter. One responds beautifully to standard positive reinforcement protocols. The other finds food rewards overstimulating and actually performs better with calm praise and environmental rewards. Same genetics, same environment, completely different individuals.
Why the Generic Approach Causes Harm
When we apply one-size-fits-all training methods without considering these factors, we don’t just fail to solve problems—we often create new ones.
The anxious dog who needs predictability and calm gets subjected to high-energy, stimulation-based training that escalates their stress.
The high-drive working breed gets told they’re “too excited” and needs to “calm down” when what they actually need is appropriate outlets for their genetic drives.
The guardian breed gets labeled “aggressive” for being suspicious of strangers when they’re simply doing exactly what they were bred to do.
The sensitive dog gets labeled “stubborn” when they shut down from training methods that feel too forceful for their temperament.
In every case, the failure isn’t the dog’s. It’s the training approach that refuses to see the individual in front of them.
What Actually Works: Individualized, Science-Based Approaches
Effective dog behavior support isn’t about finding the “right” training method. It’s about understanding the whole dog—their learning history, their environment, their genetics, and their individual personality—and creating an approach that works WITH those factors rather than against them.
This means:
- Assessing the dog’s environment and emotional climate before assuming the issue is purely behavioral
- Understanding breed-specific traits and working with genetic predispositions rather than fighting them
- Recognizing individual differences in temperament, sensitivity, and learning style
- Adjusting expectations based on realistic understanding of what’s possible for this specific dog
- Addressing root causes (stress, unmet needs, unclear communication) rather than just suppressing symptoms
The Bottom Line
The science is clear: dogs are complex individuals shaped by learning history, environmental factors, genetics, and unique personalities. One-size-fits-all training ignores this complexity and treats dogs as interchangeable units that should all respond identically to the same methods.
They’re not. And they won’t.
Real behavior change comes from understanding the specific dog in front of you and creating an individualized approach that addresses their actual needs—not just applying a generic protocol and hoping for the best.
The dogs have been trying to tell us this all along. Maybe it’s time we started listening.
Leave a Reply